What War on Terror?


Who Voted for the Patriot Act??

http://1.usa.gov/muyrSP – reauthorize the patriot act 2011
http://bit.ly/luocqF – voted for the patriot act 2001 and 2006

Enabling Act of 1933 vs. US Patriot Act 2001

http://bit.ly/lEqxVo – US Pat Act vs Hitler Enabling Act
http://bit.ly/mOW9RV – The Judge: Natural Rights and Pat Act

Government Could Have Prevented 9/11 without Patriot Act

http://bit.ly/iS3Ono – Fox News: Secrets of 9/11
http://bit.ly/lndCEP – Complete 9/11 Timeline
http://bit.ly/izTe1n – Reason Mag and Harry Samit
http://bbc.in/kmz3xV – BBC and Harry Samit

Congressional Hearing on the TSA Oversight and Whole Body Imaging

http://1.usa.gov/mcd2mo – TSA Oversight Part 1: Whole Body Imaging

US Was Warned about the Underwear Bomber

http://thetim.es/ivSSSa – Warned about Underwear bomber
http://abcn.ws/jVPdJb – Missed Underwear bomber
http://exm.nr/kzvy2N – Napolitano admits US knew Underwear bomber

 

The patriot act of 2001 resembles the enabling act of 1933.  Most people will be surprised that the enabling act of 1933 was enacted by the third reich in nazi germany and not in america.  for the people who would still support the patriot act after all we know about the integrity of today’s politicians i will go over many reasons why the patriot act has nothing to do with terrorism.  If interested in hearing more [ on the similarities of the Patriot Act and Enabling Act you should follow the links here that are also below the video.

http://bit.ly/lEqxVo – US Pat Act vs Hitler Enabling Act
http://bit.ly/mOW9RV – The Judge: Natural Rights and Pat Act

The concept of war on terror is fallacious.  Anyone can be a terrorist.  the biggest fear tactic in recent history is the ‘war on terror’.  this can be re-worded as the war on being scared and can be related to similar tactics.  Any Russian with a computer seems to use spam for marketing.  This well known parent, Jenny McCarthy uses time-outs when previously she was a playboy playmate and talk show host.  Before steroids Mark and Jose might have bunted between hitting home runs.  On his way to millionaire status this man probably had to make some cold calls to raise money and sell his ideas.  Here is a former Berkeley professor who turned terrorist and became known as the unibomber.  A former patriot who was in desert storm was out for revenge against the US government in 1993 for the government’s massacre in Waco TX.  What about this well educated doctor who practiced medicine throughout the 80s became al qaeda’s number 2 in command in the 90s.  And finally, over medicated nerdy white kids turn to terrorism in 1999.  Yes, even though they didn’t use a bomb or praise Allah, they are terrorists.  The bottom line is a tactic can be adopted and implemented by anyone with little or no training.

Another aspect in recent history to realize ‘war on terror’ is false is the open border policy the US shares with Mexico.  There are supposedly two wars going on around the US/Mexico boarder; the war on terror and the war on drugs.  The war on drugs is another topic regarding lies and perpetual war.  Why is it that the border can’t be secured?  Israel has a secure border, North Korea secures it’s border, Soviet Russia was able to keep people within the walls of Berlin for about 30 years.  Even the Minutemen Project who are a national citizens neighborhood watch had success in decreasing drug trafficking on the parts of the border where they were located.  I am not making an argument for secure borders, I am making an argument that during any war on terror or even the perpetual war on drugs the border where the most illegal trafficking happens is the border that should be most secure.  The border from Sept 11, 2001 to now has never been secured as though there was any security threat.  After sept 11 2001 the airports were closed, all fights canceled, border check points were closed but nothing was done to increase security on the border.  The people and the precious drugs still flowed as free as they did before.  You would think that to make it look good right after 9/11 president bush would have militarized the borders and would have probably shot on sight anyone attempting to cross just like fight 93 or any other hijacked plane would have been shot down before it would be allowed to hit it’s target.  Then I would imagine the borders would go back to normal when the military was sent to invade iraq 2003.  We didn’t have secure borders because we never had a war on terrorism.  How can DHS have numbers of apprehended foreign nationals in these numbers if we are constantly under the threat of terrorism?  Keep in mind the operative word is apprehended.  How many more are never caught?

The past 10 years is another place to find evidence that the war on terror is simply a tactic used by the government to justify trampling the constitution, civil liberties and the american way of life.

Most recently there is the body scanners and TSA pat downs.  The most recent government accountability office reports that the scanners fail more than not and congressman mica on 3/16/2011 had a hearing on this fact. (audio).  If the GAO has tested these body scanners to show they fail more than are accurate why are the american people subjected to this form of treatment?

http://1.usa.gov/mcd2mo – TSA Oversight Part 1: Whole Body Imaging

The underwear bomber was allowed to get on the plane.  There was many warnings about this guy from his own father and he was already on the terrorist watch list.  So how could someone on the terror watch list get on any international flight?

More recently than that fox news ran a program called ‘The Secrets of 9/11’ on 5/20/2011 revealing many points where the US government knew about most of the hijackers and failed to push and follow up on the leads they had.  The US just didn’t pursue the intel they had.  There wasn’t any patriot act at the time and they had all they needed to investigate and very likely stop the 9/11 attacks.  There was also knowledge of the threat of a terrorist attack in the fbi.  just do a search for Harry Samit.    See all links below to find references to see how the US government had all they needed without the patriot act to investigate all known terrorist in the US.  There is even a complete timeline showing how the US had followed or initiated the organization of terrorist groups in the world.

http://bit.ly/lndCEP – complete 9/11 timeline

http://thetim.es/ivSSSa – Warned about Underwear bomber

http://abcn.ws/jVPdJb – Missed Underwear bomber

http://exm.nr/kzvy2N – Napolitano admits US knew Underwear bomber

http://bit.ly/iS3Ono – Fox News: Secrets of 9/11

http://bbc.in/kmz3xV – BBC and Harry Samit

http://bit.ly/izTe1n – Reason Mag and Harry Samit

The point has been to get the american people used to government intrusion.  Where the full intentions of the US government might end up is secure the internet, full body scanners for airport, bus and train stations, Europe style CCTV, in other words, cameras everywhere.  The only sect of the population against such intrusion are some moderate liberals and libertarians.  Republicans seem to be more interested in protecting george bush’s legacy rather than admitting his presidency was an absolute failure.  Unfortunately the liberals who had regular protests against George Bush have gone silent now that Barrack Obama is president.

In order to keep the US a free society is to put your vote behind anyone who is committed to the US constitution.  You will hear the people worth voting for use the constitution in their arguments and reasoning when voting against most democrats social agenda or the republicans need for securing a police state.

While you wait to hear from these people please read up by starting with the links below.

http://1.usa.gov/muyrSP – reauthorize the patriot act 2011

http://bit.ly/luocqF – voted for the patriot act 2001 and 2006

Obama heads-up UN Security Council




This is just a quick post about Obama taking on the head role in the UN security council this month.  Being a former instructor of constitutional law he must know that since he is president of the US he is not eligible to fill this position.

The concept ‘the ends justify the means’ is very popular among politicians these days.  In this case the ends are the global agreement about what to do with left-over nuclear weapons and the sale of ‘yet to be manufactured’ nuclear weapons.  The means is bending the limits of the constitution to settle the nuclear problem himself.

====Article 1, Section 9====
No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince or foreign State.
=====================

If all goes well globally i am sure this will make him look like a hero and at home some people will ridicule him for not upholding his oath to preserve and protect the constitution after they are done with other politicians who passed national healthcare and the patriot act which go a lot further in breaking constitutional law.

CNN Post

New York Daily